There is a reason they didn't ask our opinions on

Question

There is a reason they didn't ask our opinions on

ratios. Because they know that you would have 3 communities claiming they have the most value. This is the reason they came up with the fairest ratio. I don't understand why you come in complaining to other holders. Take it to Ben. The negotiation on ratio is done. It is the only legal way to split and combine the three in the time frame they want as well as massively keeping costs down. Where do you guys think all this money is going to come from to keep this project alive to see the tech? Do you want your r&d and production teams cash strapped in their growth? How can they pay to hire more engineers and sustain their salaries? They don't have to with the merger. You can legally share people from department to department without having to worry about overlap. Those people saying can't we just have an alliance over a merger, sure, but it isn't the same thing and the alliance only grows as fast as all 3 combined. Say we have an alliance, and fet goes to 10 bucks and AIGX still at around $1.50. Fet will have way more capital to work with and will grow faster than AIGX. In an alliance, FET cannot just say hey AGIX, here.... Take some of our investors money. Under a merger, it's another department and therefore if it needs more funding and is holding everything back, more people and money can be easily addressed as you are one company

#cryptocurrency #english #singularitynet

0

31.03.2024

11 ответов

85 просмотров

Uncle Pecos Автор вопроса

Vladimir🇺🇦
It is logical, but why 0.43, and not for example 0...

Because it's 100% attached to the value of the currencies. Over the 15 days average, AGIX was worth .43 the cost of FET. If the price of AGIX was higher, then the ratio would have been higher. If you went to .65, FET would only get .77 of their value. They weren't made up out of thin air. Right now, each FET is worth double. More than double. So how do you surmise we take FET value that investors paid money for and give it to someone else? That would devalue the price of the project. Only way that works is to mint more to give AGIX and lower the value of everyone elses

0

7 месяцев назад

Mowzzza

Uncle Pecos
Because it's 100% attached to the value of the cur...

Then we should have merged in March 23, or better to wait till token prices even out

0

7 месяцев назад

Uncle Pecos Автор вопроса

Mowzzza
Then we should have merged in March 23, or better ...

But they didn't or they didn't think of this then and now they need this to get where they want to go. So, your total token amount will be reduced and the value will be the same or higher. You now get exposure to an established Coinbase market that now puts you in the running for any possible ETF's in the future.

0

7 месяцев назад

T bone - ASI

Mowzzza
Then we should have merged in March 23, or better ...

I don't think you're understanding that your $ value of agix right now is the same amount of asi you will receive regardless of ratio

0

7 месяцев назад

Uncle Pecos Автор вопроса

T bone - ASI
I don't think you're understanding that your $ val...

Hence the reason there is a ratio

0

7 месяцев назад