strength is commercialization. SingularityNET's strength is research to make AGI and ASI a reality. Both are important equally and imho the latter even more then the former.
It's clear that Fetch is stronger in making a commercial deal. Commercialization is better rewarded then the research. Fetch is also really good in applying tactics to get the deal done on their terms. Healthy, transparant debate is simply not possible because the WP is not ready in time, not even now the vote is postponed. Why announce the merge and fix the ratio's before the WP is ready?
I sense different cultures with different value's in the different communities. I truly believe that the open, honest and transparant culture of SingularityNet is necessary for the benevolence of the AGI.
I will vote YES anyway, because I trust the team and more importantly I trust that the consciousness behind the SingularityNet culture and values will prevail no matter what commercial deal is made.
I appreciate you cleanly spelling out what I’ve been trying to compute… haha this is how I saw it as well (of course without any deep dive of their companies which I will do).
I agree with your oberaervations. However, your expected vote does not align with the aspects you have mentioned. Like: "I do not like the smell of this, being SNET contribution ln equally or more relevant than FETCH commercialisation. But I am going to swallow it anyway." Younar in perfect right to do what you see fit But please, understand that your deductions and expected plan of action are incoherent, and that the destiny younare rooting for is based on faith instead of in your analysis of the situation.
The situation is this that a No vote will not bring benevolent AGI any closer. I trust consciousness to prevail. It's that simple.
Could you elaborate?
Thankfully
Обсуждают сегодня