i dont agree with quite some of the contents, (especially with the concerns already addressed by ben and others over the past days)
Could you share more? The calls were moved last minute and no FAQ provided so it's been hard to follow along (again, the rush...)
Some initial personal views on the points raised centralisation risk - foundations remain independent, no shared treasuries, its a token merger hostile takeover - just not factual software dev - same thing, foundations remain independent, with more firepower towards decentralised AGI market response - i dont think the token price reflects sentiment, we're part of a broader crypto market Contradictory claims - i think this just is incorrect Its a long doc and not much point on me giving these high level remarks on all but yeah i just cant say i agree with the contents
Except the control of the token is now by 6 people. And the token has a lot of power over everything, no?
Обсуждают сегодня