to my views on decentralisation?
If the new structure wasn't run by a tiny committee without community power, I would change my recommendation to in favour
Sorry but you don't make any sense. You are claiming all the time that it is all about "decentralisation" but in your paper you are clearly trespassing the borders of your job towards the community by stating all your other opinions aganst the merger(like future price uncertainties). This smells like FUD.
My personal point is about decentralisation. Then we tried to do an overarching review merging all concerns we found
You should have sticked to what was your job only. This made you look like a bunch of people representing their private financial interests.
My private financial interest would be served short term better by the proposal passing, and medium term by it failing and a better deal being made
This is it right here. If I had control, I'd fire who ever allowed that to be published. It's like a little kid wrote it amidst a temper tantrum
Yeah just imagine everyone here would put together a pApEr and post it here with their own private opinion about the merger.
Why not? The whole point of this is deliberation and then everyone can decide how to vote
It would be a mess. That's why not. You are in a council REPRESENTING the interests of the community regarding decentralization. Nothing more nothing less.
Обсуждают сегодня