say? Because then there's no point discussing and we can just agree to disagree
We do. We’re voting. That’s our say. If the vote is no, feel free to approach Ocean and Fetch and see if they meet you in the boardroom. Let’s be clear that this is in fact what would have to happen. Some folks strongly advocating for the no vote seem to be laboring under the delusion that the 3 CEOs will give it another go at the merger, allowing for price manipulation of the kind the crypto world hasn’t seen before while they negotiate the merger out in the open :)) Give me one example in the history of the world when something of the kind you’re proposing has ever happened. Without debating the merits of the merger itself, I’m beginning to believe that a no vote is a desire for status quo by those who are large holders and are afraid of taking the leap forward, or take the risk, take a chance, call it what you will. If the vote is no, there will be no merger.
There have been many proposals for spin offs, token mergers and swaps with community engagement and votes...
Обсуждают сегодня