If you're our concerned with getting more value than the

Question

If you're our concerned with getting more value than the

current tech is worth and trying to put a price on its future alone, I understand. But without listening to the people at the top saying that if others beat us to this it makes achieving what we all want next to impossible, therefore making our investment worth nothing.

So what is it about? Money. This whole thing is a gamble. That's why people don't invest. You either win or you don't and those are the basic facts.

So.... Ask yourself these three things:

1. Does big tech have the means to win the race, meaning capital and power?

2. Number 1 is a yes for me. So then do you want to go into the competition alone with your current quantity of tokens knowing you have a massive infrastructure to build, your 2 to 4 yrs away from AGI, according to Ben, and if you still win the race all your dreams come true but if you lose you get nothing and have wasted your time?

3. Or do you want to go into the competition with this merge that may existentially speed up your time frame to achieving AGI allowing you to move capital and resources between all three entities, build together, utilize each other, cut down reporting requirements, eliminate or transfer people from redundant positions. This choice will dilute tokens among all three, increase circulating supply and dilute governance for some (realistically it's always the ones that got in real early that control the project with massive wallets so it's a mute point til we get to 1 wallet 1 vote) but you lose no monetary value... But, you get an aggregation of people, resources, exposure, CEX/DEX, Coinbase for possible ETF injection... Allowing more exposure and injection of resources to better your chances of achieving AGI, knowing that if you do you wont make as much money as you would have in option 2, but your token will still pass Ethereum? Also, you can still lose the race and get nothing

#cryptocurrency #english #singularitynet

0

09.04.2024

2 ответов

69 просмотров

Uncle Pecos Автор вопроса

H m
Spoken like a bad negotiatior trying to rationaliz...

Again. It's a merger

0

7 месяцев назад

H m · Accepted Answer

H m

Spoken like a bad negotiatior trying to rationalize a bad deal rather than renegotiate a better deal. It is not either or. Nothing ever is. You can renegotiate and get the precious ASI alliance. Everything is always negotiable, one of the 1st things you learn with life experience. 2) the moment this negotiation became about price it had already failed.

0

7 месяцев назад

209 похожих чатов

If you're our concerned with getting more value than the

2 ответов

Похожие вопросы