and Q2 everytime with the same amour of 355K ?
Yes I see this myself indeed
Why not? We've all heard ourselves from Ben that it won't hamper What's being built. Slow down maybe? Not stop anything. Also has been said by Ben that we will be fine without the merge. According to the team.wr aren't going to best big tech but we can offer.an alternative.
Hey! Actually I do plan to "best" Big Tech, not by doing transformer NNs better (which would take at least billions of usd) but by adding better cognitive architectures (deployed decentrally) to the mix...
Ben let's be real. Never got an answer last time I mentioned it. You seeked private funding for 100 million for zarqua and failed. That's a fact. And now you are asking to take 100 million tokens from agix. Am I wrong
Do you hear yourself? You pushed the exact same thing during phase2 emergency vote? What the actual !@#$ is any different. Your dead set on a merger of tokens but remaining separate entities.
Did you not plan to best big tech when phase 2 was proposed? Was it not to build our own ecosystem? Did agi holders not take a 50 percent token depreciation to support that? This deal on face value is nothing more then a pr token merger.
But Ben your own words/teams has basically been this is our best chance to win?? We were given the same look here we can achieve amazing things and now your saying look over here. We can achieve great things. What exactly does this provide other then a token merger? You've said multiple times that agix is still it's own entity. Why exactly can't a partnership do exactly the same thing?
Slow down in this situation is ‘self destructive’ IMO
The common incentives involved in a partnership are obviously much, much less...
Why? If all 3 are remaining separate entities and basically doing their own thing What exactly is different then a partnership?
Shared economic incentive for ASI token utilization
Обсуждают сегодня