Here'S a visual analysis of the voting results in a

Question

Here'S a visual analysis of the voting results in a

similar fashion as those that I did for Deep Funding round 1-3. I've used the CSV file from https://voting.singularitynet.io/results as data and my open source library https://robert-haas.github.io/gravis-docs for the graph visualization.

Explanation:
- The horizontal line in the middle represents all wallets, sorted by their balance in ascending order from left to right, i.e. shrimps on the left side and whales on the right side. You can zoom in by scrolling, and then hover over each circle to see the wallet, which provides its balance and a link to a wallet explorer. Ethereum wallets are colored blue, Cardano wallets magenta. The size of a wallet represents its sqrt(balance), so that the area roughly corresponds to the wallet's voice in the voting, i.e. larger circles have more say due to a greater AGIX balance.
- The three circles on the top represent the possible answers to question 1: "Do you approve of implementing the proposed tokenomic merger with Fetch.ai and Ocean Protocol?". If you hover over them, you see the percentage and total AGIX balance in favor of each answer. You also see which wallets voted for that answer in form of the lines that get highlighted. Yes votes are colored green, no votes are colored red, abstain votes are colored black.
- The three circles on the bottom represent the possible answers to question 2: "Do you approve of accelerating the minting of 100M AGIX of the Foundation’s Phase Two allocation?"

Since there have been some irritations about a) the role of the foundation wallet and b) the role of whales in the outcome, I've also done the same analysis on filtered data. If you remove the foundation wallet, there's a 70.48% yes outcome. If you remove all whales >350k, a cut-off chosen to remove the AGIX-ADA whale with multiple wallets, there's a 81.71% yes outcome. My personal conclusion is, while technically some whales could have overpowered voters with smaller balances, that did not happen in this vote. The visual distribution of green and red lines indicates that the voting behavior was quite evenly distributed over wallets of all sizes, and the alternative calculations show that if only smaller wallets had a say the outcome would have been also a resounding yes vote.

#cryptocurrency #english #singularitynet

0

16.04.2024

1 ответов

78 просмотров

Hugo "It's a trap!" · Accepted Answer

Hugo "It's a trap!"

Thank you so much for this.

0

8 месяцев назад

209 похожих чатов

Here'S a visual analysis of the voting results in a

1 ответов

Похожие вопросы