proposal 10. I don't mind this getting rejected (community will come up with a better one), but I don't see this ~24M ANC in the vote history. How do you explain this?
Ooooh good Q
https://finder.terra.money/columbus-5/account/terra12vp8yq4wygfl9gssjs8k3kagrv3kx7ppexzqv2
One person voted 24M?? This isn't destroys the idea of decentralization in Anchor... Decentralization is a mirage with this governance system. Soon everyone will see...
Whales exist everywhere
The moment a vote doesnt go the way you want you say decentralization is a mirage.....Whales should have more say as they have more incentive to dothe right thing...one man one vote is for democracy where uninformed people have equal say...on blockchains one token one vote and those with more tokens have more votes......I see nothing wrong with this....If I had 24 million ANC I would not want to do anything to increase sell pressure on the ANC token and as for those that loss $$$ to this oracle error account for this next time you take a loan and keep TVL very very conservative....I voted NO on this as this part of the risk you take when u take out leveraged loan....I would and do support adding Chain link oracles as well as adding Band oracles
You make fair points, but a better system must be devised
I don't care about your NO vote. And your opinions are useless. Understand the risk we took while we borrowed; a fault with Anchor protocol wasn't part. We trusted Anchor protocol to liquidate us at the appropriate price and we got f#%3d
point being not whose fault it is...point is you choose to take risk and event occurred that lead to you losing funds.....ANC hodlers should not be expected to take loss with you....
Are you ignorant or you are just certified to be rude? Even the team at Anchor Protocol realize that reimbursement as an option. What you trying to say us is next tune an erroneous liquidation occur at an inappropriate price of $0 Bluna, we shd blame the borrower.. That's utterly rubbish. There're acceptable risk within Defi on ANC borrowing and this wasn't part.
Name calling shows you have no real rebuttal......all I said is free mkt should be free....you take leverage then the win is all yours and Im saying so should the loss..........you disagree
Why not ? Anc shareholders are "investing" in the the protocol ! So their position should be affected by the performance of the exact risk the shareholders are taking !
not taking side here in the argument, but have there been an investigation that concluded what the root cause of this issue was?
NO WAY should ANC holders be penalized for speculative leveraged borrowing by individuals
To be fair "speculative leveraged borrowing" by individuals is one of the only two products that this protocol has, the other one being savings. If you antagonize the borrowers there will be no collateral to generate income to pay the savers.
yes...and thats another possible risk
Обсуждают сегодня