exactly! Not as cut and dry as some would like to pretend.
It is cut and dry. Enabling voting for unvested tokens is clearly a mistake.
I think you're missing my point with the "cut and dry" remark. If they didn't own the tokens at all, they shouldn't have been able to vote with them. I'm pointing out the ambiguity of ownership...mistake or not.
THIS
There was @TheRealTrimBot in the room that day. He didn’t care about governance. Probably said guys those idiots who bought tokens don’t care about vesting and unvesting. Just take the tokens and vote.
Yes, this is exactly right
Exactly. That’s why I tell people to go somewhere when they talk about lawsuits. :) —> but moving forward I think governance should be discussed or else users/token holders will cry foul yet again. :)
Overlooked, by them, as they designed the contract.
Обсуждают сегодня