Baseledger platform was chosen to be the notarization layer, with sync-tree exits to Ethereum at a later point in time. “
This surely can be answered.
Nothing changed - there is no contradiction. The 90% are the cases at that time we knew and where/are suing Baseledger. That is not a contradition to having a significant amount of tx from UB.ONE now on different chains. You could even have 1% of the cases not using Baseledger and this 1% making for the huge amount of tx on different chains. Theoretically speaking....
So the TXs on Baseledger are the live clients nothing being tested?
90% of 10 is 9 for example. If you got 10 more using something else, it then becomes 9 out of 20.
Yeah, I think I understood what Marten said.
What about this one?
Обсуждают сегодня