I don’t want to take it. I was perfectly happy with fetch, it’s tokenomics, my price targets and the price action before this mornings announcement. I think we all were, so why even take such a risk?
Yess
because no risk, no gain
Everyone was. Like literally we were breaking ATH before this thing.
But you need to understand. This project is not build for your gains. The team don’t think about you and your gains.
We are taking risk on fetch to be clear it’s still speculative. But this is risk on top of risk, when we were all content with the status quo. Yesterday, if you asked someone here about their sentiment on Fetch, it would be overwhelmingly positive. So why fix something that isn’t broken? As of now, it is 100% guaranteed that our gains are slashed in half if this proposal goes through. It is uncertain that this merger will help us exceed returns that fetch would have on its own. But our slashed gains are 100% going to happen, mathematically. Unless you were bearish on Fetch, why introduce such risk?
100% guarantee btw. No win no fee
ONLY if we keep growing at the same rate - and that is an assumption underlying your entire thought paradigm. the problem is, you don't know if this isn't a catalysator, resulting from network combined and community activity
Exactly. We don’t know…but what we DO now is that our gains are slashed in half at every price point now. That has a 100% certainty just based on the math….I don’t want to take more risk when I was happy with Fetch on its own, and price action has shown it can handle things on its own.
that is only IF we keep growing as if we had never merged - and that is a flawed assumption of yours that you've been blinding out all day.
Your “if” implies uncertainty. That’s my point. On one hand, there’s a chance 0 < X <= 100% our gains are increased. On the other, there’s a 100% chance that our gains will be slashed in half at each price point. That is risk. No reason to take it unless you’re unhappy with fetch’s price performance in the past few months.
all of crypto is uncertain.
How can be in half? CEO confirmed if 1:1 ratio meaning if the price is 3.10 now the youll get the same ASI??
You can’t explain it better. people can’t comprehend that no matter what happens with ASIS their gains were cut by half since the begging.
Supply is doubling. Market cap is doubling.
Dude but you’re getting double of the supply. God dammit. If you currently own 100 fet and the total supply is 1000 fet, you own 10% of the total supply. If now you get 100 asis out of your 100 fet and the total supply of asis is 2000, now you only own 5% of the total supply.
Lets say it double and you get the same ratio, wheres the earning will be half? It will stay stagnat but not half with what you earn now??
How fking hard is it to understand this basic shit.
You wouldn't have any certainty either if FET would not merge.
Ok sir Before: Fetch price: $20 Market cap: $20bn After ASI price: $20 Market cap: $40bn Getting to $40bn is much harder than $20bn - so at some point our gains will be capped lower than it was before. Unless you think this is going to run into infinity, eventually an upper boundary will be reached which will signify top. That top needs to be 2x higher than what Fetch would have achieved on its own for this to be worth it. Otherwise we have missed opportunity cost.
But the FIAT pair would be the same value, you are ignoring the money cominf from the projects that are being merged
Too much focus on numbers and supply instead of the fact that the result of the merger will be bigger than just the sum of all three.
Which means that in order to produce more X’s you require more money inflow. How is that good?
I would have a solid project that has returned excellent gains in the past few months with a nearly fully unlocked supply and decent upside based off of the historical potential of other cryptos.
So it will not be earning half but it will stay like x2 at max for future return not x10 anymore due to higher MC
Essentially ASI will need twice as much money to achieve the same return as Fetch at the same price That’s the gamble
Why can’t it reach a 70bn mcap?
Обсуждают сегодня