a reality that had previously been denied or ignored. The fact that SingularityNet alone cannot, as we had been led to believe, create AGI. That the narrative was too enthusiastic and in isolation. So back to reality.
However, if the previous analysis, expectations and objectives were wrong or unattainable with the means at our disposal, what about this new project?
What credit can we give it?
I think that's a fair challenge, but also think we need to recognise that AI is moving VERY fast and crypto is (as a tech) VERY new used at scale. I don't think the original approach was naive, though I do suspect ETH was more "best right now" than perfect.
Well, just like in the real world, a lot of things are happening very fast. And time is critical. I believe SNET can create AGI *eventually*. A merger and cooperation will make it come faster, which is critical.
That is incorrect. The justification is that this might help speed things up.
Обсуждают сегодня