if another project wants to use the Bridge does its users also need to hold Albt to use this Bridge, in conjunction to paying fees with the network's own native token?
Thank you, The responses are detailed as always! If theres no bridge roadmap then thats fine 👍 I know only of SDK that is next. Do you have any answers to my last question? Regarding keeping Albt to bridge tokens in conjuction to the network's own native token. (Trying to understand how far the utility of the token extends)
Based on Rachid's explanation of the ecosystem, I can provide an answer I think. This also supports my previous message about encouraging users to have and use ALBT: "Adoption will start with LMaaS and later DeFi terminal, The bridge also will use ALBT to function, Trustless KYC will use ALBT, data tunnel is fueld by albt, ALBT is central in our prodcut and we expect more and more adoption of our utility token. Fundrs also will play a huge role of the utility of ALBT because of the smart DAO we are building”. On that basis, I believe it is clear that the ALBT fee while bridging will continue to be one of the token's utilities.
Обсуждают сегодня