to the Brainstem team to ask them why they have changed the fundrs presale contract unilaterally and by doing so downgrading the credibility of fundrsplatform? It was clearly stated that we buy for a certain price so many tokens and that it would be distributed and certain dates and vestingschedule. Brainstems has decided to changes the dates and therefore us as investors receiving our assets at later dates than stated in the fundrs agreement. This will set all investors back as they have a chance of receiving more coins in a time where the market could be worse. That’s a break of the agreement and future information on fundrs sales one can not rely on!
time the market...better for all of us, they did the same for $rkfi...we will see, for the moment it did not downgrading the credibility...But i understand you in this case...
It does sound like they are breaking their own contract, not Fundrs, as Fundrs is a launchpad with several projects, including brainstems launching on it.
Yeah I know they are breaking their own contract but subsequently the contact was made on fundrs, so basically can one trust the contracts made on fundrs when they can be changed afterwards?
This whining about projects postponing is so funny, you have made decision to invest EARLY stage before token is launching in the market. There is dozens moving parameters to make token launch succesful. Truth is brainstems or any other project doesn’t dictate lanching schedule IF they want to launch it in quality CEX’s and launchpads. If they choose to launch only in DEX’s then its different story.
A contract is a contract. Then make the contract without any certain dates. I invested real money in it, with the knowledge they presented me. You think that is whining. Sorry you must be from another planet.
What is the expected reaction here though? You can never know if any projects decide to not honor the agreement after collecting funds on a launchpad
Two ways Nexara can deal with this. Either one makes contact with the firm that breaks the contract and deals with it. Two Nexara accepts the fact that the contacts they offer on fundrs will not be met in the future, but then needs to clearly inform the investors on their platform that likely the contract they close on fundrs platform will be broken and Nexara is helpless to do anything about it. This way investors know where they stand before investing on fundrs. You ask me what reaction is expected? If it was my business and part of my core business is offering contracts to third parties and later those contracts are broken, that would be of great concern to me and my business! Because my credibility as a company is in jeapardy and you ask me what reaction is expected?
I see your point, but what you’re asking for here is a disclaimer. Which is the first thing that pops up once you open the Brainstems page on Fundrs, “Timelines and vesting are subject to change”
The contract you agreed to is that timelines and vesting are subject to change. Also grabbing from your message “likely the contract they close on Fundrs platform will be broken” is just completely offensive, luckily I am just a moderator keeping this place safe and atmosphere clean
I say that because the projects Fundrs chooses to feature are not a selection of contract breaking scams, but well vetted projects with a vision; projects deciding to adjust their timeline to have better sentiment or no market shattering news going on during their launch can do so, as they have placed a disclaimer beforehand, that this might happen
Обсуждают сегодня