subscription plan feature and usage track. here is my current schema.
Table TeamPlan
(
workspace_id : bigint pk
storage : bigint
video_duration_limit : bigint
audio_duration_limit : bigint
... other feature fields usage
)
Table TeamPlanUsage (
workspace_id : bigint pk
storage_usage: bigint
video_duration_usage : bigint
audio_duration_usage : bigint
... other feature fields usage
)
same as for BoardPlan.
should i go with it? is it good to go?
Possible Improvements or Considerations: 1. Ensure that there is a foreign key relationship between TeamPlanUsage.workspace_id and TeamPlan.workspace_id. This maintains referential integrity. 2. Consider indexing fields that are frequently queried to speed up data retrieval, especially if your tables become large. 3. If tracking changes over time is important, consider adding timestamp fields like created_at and updated_at to track when records are created or modified. 4. If your plans are likely to evolve with more features, consider a more flexible structure for features. For instance, a key-value pair table for features could make it easier to add new features without altering the table schema. 5. Review for opportunities to further normalize the data if redundancy is observed, but balance this with the performance needs of your application. 6. Assuming the BoardPlan follows a similar structure, ensure consistency in design and naming conventions across different plan types. Additional Suggestions: Historical Data Tracking: If historical data is important (e.g., how usage grows over time), consider a separate table to log historical usage. Alerts for Limit Approaching: Implement functionality to alert users as they approach their plan limits.
if i give screenshot of feature then can you please help me to identify it.
Обсуждают сегодня