The topics of a field become augmented by capitalist and

political agendas, so experts could choose to become either pawns of the government or enemies of it.
For example, expert hackers may be hired to work for the government as intelligence gatherers or nation state attack perpetrators, or, they might choose to become anti-state-surveillance activists with the same skillset. i mean, an expert hacker could also choose to not use their skills for either of those things and make an average living working in IT, but technically speaking that would be inclusive of the capitalist agenda of your company. Being considered a part of a greater whole of society that is following the order of things, but some just dont want to be in that order, and some of those people also end up going "missing".

It's a frightful world to be an expert in something useful to a government or money hungry enterprise. I'm not trying to sound redpilled or woke, but i think i can just say these things based on personal observation since ive never read into any conspiracy theories or books about this stuff, its just stuff ive seen in my lifetime. One example I'm thinking of is that of my own uncle. He is a mathematics major or statistician or something, he was working in Washington DC at a large bank for a while, he was asked to go in and fix some database structures or such, and once he had taught the staff how to do the job, they fired him. I personally would find this to be an injustice, but also not surprising since it is a reflection of the world we live in, where knowledge is treated as a commodity to achieve a goal in some greater agenda. Forgetting the needs and relevance of actual people.

Forgetting to credit the achievements of those who are these 'experts' we keep hearing about, but do we ever know who they are really? We might be able to find out, but they just exist in the shadows of whoever is exploiting those experts. Can money really be a fair compensation for spending your life learning to be expert on something? Fame is not what I'm talking about here. Fame is temporary anyway, but what I'm talking about is personal interest in those who are the experts. By governments, by companies, whoever "uses" an expert should take more time to acknowledge how important that expert is to them company, how without them, they wouldn't be heading anywhere. It's not about putting the expert's name in neon letters, its just appreciating them a little more.

I think that's basically what im driving at, the experts we hear about are underappreciated for the amount of work and research they've done in their life, usually for the benefit of society. And that brings out another point, are there experts who became experts purely for personal gain? If so, should their life's work still not be appreciated more? You can't become an expert overnight regardless of your motivations. If they use their expertise for evil purposes, then most likely appreciation wouldn't be due. But then good and bad could be considered relative as i mentioned before with which side someone takes, helping government to infringe privacy for anti-terroristic measures or standing against it with the ideals of keeping privacy as a greater priority.

I wouldn't want to say I take either side, nor do I condone violent/extremely intrusive measures or countermeasures to accomplish things for whatever ends. I feel society could accomplish a lot more if unconditional love for people was the main motivational force for major societal decisions and interpersonal relationships.

gov is the biggest terrorist itself. terror in old thoughts makes order, discipline, peace but also can make the opposite of these

i mean, i dont find that it's worth taking sides or even discussing these sort of things since there are people who believe that they are doing the right thing on both sides. So then how can we judge who is right or wrong if not using a neutral 3rd party's moral standards as a reference point?

results always shows that what is right or wrong. you have a base knowledge then avoid repeating mistakes and add new rules for new situations and continue like a programmer!

Iterative programming could be considered bad practice however, when an expert programmer goes to begin a program, he will first layout a flowchart and examine how each portion of the program should be constructed, optimized and so forth before beginning. It seems to me that governments have been unable to form a basic constitutional structure that puts everyone's needs ahead of their own.

that's not possible in real life. situations are variable. we are ignorant about programs but real life won't accept ignorance. userspace, kernelspace, firmwares, hardwares, real life, afterlife, etc all requires different levels of care

So maybe we need to push a firmware update on real life :P

Tldr

You tard?

Déjà vu

heh. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiJ9fy1qSFI

Seems like they're running out of myths