condition of 'send' ignored. Consider using 'transfer' instead."? i have a contract where i need to ignore the result of send() for good reasons
That would result in an unused variable warning. I'm trying to get back down to zero warnings after introducing those sends
Return that variable in the function.
I think it'd much rather do something stupid like successful = sth.send(...); successful = successful; than change the function's interface
Redundant and useless, but works🙃
Обсуждают сегодня