added here? The modifier already makes the function throw if inSwapAndLiquify = true; is not true, so the second statement seems redundant?
Research what this _; is doing inbetween them
it’s not redundant. it’s to set the inSwapAndLiquify to _false_ after it has set it to true. if you check the function it was attached to, you’ll see that the function checks the inSwapAndLiquify.
Обсуждают сегодня