Thanks! Yes, I am aware of that. What would you

Question

Go

Harry Cee

Thanks! Yes, I am aware of that. What would you

instead use while referring to the "initialised objects"?

0

21.03.2021

8 ответов

11 просмотров

Harry Cee Автор вопроса

Насер Мирзаи
when you start to use a new language find its Zen ...

Appreciate but I am specifically after the verbiage. For instance, What would you call the "objects" 'x' and 'bar' of <T Foo> ? var bar Foo x := Foo{"sunday"}

0

21.03.2021

drunktimelord

Harry Cee
Appreciate but I am specifically after the verbiag...

there's no generics in go

0

21.03.2021

Насер Мирзаи

drunktimelord
there's no generics in go

their question is something else

0

21.03.2021

drunktimelord

Harry Cee
Appreciate but I am specifically after the verbiag...

these are just Foo structs

0

21.03.2021

Насер Мирзаи

Harry Cee
Appreciate but I am specifically after the verbiag...

I think the answer of this question is "Instance" as @drunktimelord said

0

21.03.2021

drunktimelord

Насер Мирзаи
I think the answer of this question is "Instance" ...

instance is an OOP word

0

21.03.2021

Насер Мирзаи

drunktimelord
instance is an OOP word

I think not

0

21.03.2021

Насер Мирзаи · Accepted Answer

Насер Мирзаи

when you start to use a new language find its Zen and think in its way, not the previous one. for what you call initialized objects you can do in some ways. One of those is it: type Foo struct { Bar string } func NewFoo(bar string) Foo { return Foo{Bar: bar} } Also you can benefit from interfaces for a more advanced code.

0

21.03.2021

Похожие чаты

Thanks! Yes, I am aware of that. What would you

8 ответов

Похожие вопросы