What he’s proposing is great But at the very start he stated that if it’s just a liquidity issue we just wait for slow withdrawals Which I’m not sure pertain to any of the 3 approaches he takes (all assume a degree of insolvency ?) So my issue is there was no option in that dynamic - & he seems to say he doesn’t know the finances (logical as he’s not internal or on the board) So it was a great interview and set of options that are appreciate But still don’t know Celsius’s position Also interesting that they release a statement during the interview
Yeah statement release is most interesting.
What's ur take on what they were trying to imply on the statement being released during the live stream
I’m unsure if it was to detract from the live stream as maybe Board heard some things they didn’t like - or thought may cause more concerns with their financial health
If that’s the case I hope there’s someone reputable talking abt celsius and forcing celsius to give us more info -.-🤦🏻♂️
"Also interesting that they release a statement during the interview" this is SUPER important point. It's almost like celsius was saying, Hey, no you guys it's okay....we are still working on this!
If it was just a liquidity issue they wouldn't have closed down 100% of the withdrawals, they would have limited them a lot, and slowly open them back up... I'm 99% certain it's not a liquidity issue...
Unless they need the whole firepower. Leaving it open might drain it.
That's also a possibility but I don't think so...
>he seems to say he doesn’t know the finances or in other words, he is just advertising his own business.
They actually mention’stabilizing operations’ and protecting users assets a lot in those updates. I personally think they need to be able to cover for their loans in case btc goes to much lower. They allowed withdrawals, hoping there would be a reverse in the withdrawals, but then had to pause them in order to safeguard the whole situation, due to market volatility. If btc would have been at 40k while the withdrawals happened this would have been a different scenario. People were withdrawing huge amounts, someone in another group said they withdrew 600.000 on su day with 400.000 to follow the next day.
Possibly I’m not as sceptical but I’d take that as a good sign if he didn’t Less disaster planning :) Honestly I do think he’s a force for good but how to plan without the finances (with any of the 3 approaches) I have no idea what feedback we good give him
Обсуждают сегодня