this user has seen for a whole year, Dixon is the only character in this play that has been consistent with his attempts, obviously to recover his deposits, but also ours by showing himself openly and publicly to answer questions on his methods since day one. Is he being fully transparent? I don't know but NO ONE else has exposed himself to scrutiny like he has.
IF ANYONE here disagrees and finds someone else who has been this transparent and collaborative to us, I would appreciate a direct link to their proposal that explicitly gives us as much leeway and info as Dixon.
Thank you and all the best for all of us.
I agree with you. But can you tell me if Simon are supporting a newco or orderly wind-down? Or hasn't he made up a mind yet? I would vote the same as him
I keep replying to this but it keeps disappearing
As far as I can see he’s not supporting either, he’s advocating for the Ad Hoc Earn to take on more responsibilities in governance so that the other groups are not the only ones making decisions that he contends everyone should be making. Is this to his benefit, it must be for sure. He’s staying neutral he says bc he must to be able to push his agenda. He’s playing the politician. He’s a shark no doubt.
Yeah yeah. Mashinsky was also “transparent” and answered questions publicly on his AMAs
Обсуждают сегодня