Let me put it another way. If you are writing

Question

Let me put it another way. If you are writing

a compiler, you arn't writing it in python unless you hate yourself.
So you're not going to define it in terms of python. So making a distinction between the terms of python and assembly is useless. Why even bring it up?
If I'm writing a compiler, I'm writing it in one langauge, describing it in that language, maybe talking about it in mathematic terms for the hell of it, but talking about it doesn't WRITE it.
I have to translate those mathematic concepts into the language I am using because... the compiler doesn't speak "math" it speaks the language it was written to speak, some form of assembly or—if you are using an abstraction from that—perhaps C.
No where in the process of writing the compiler, are you speaking f(x) -> void except maybe a design document. :P

0

09.05.2019

2 ответов

17 просмотров

Ludovic 'Archivist' Lagouardette

More generatlly, you will also spend a lot of time translating complex terms of the mathematical abstraction into other mathematical terms that are more favorable and that is what optimization is

0

09.05.2019

Daniele° · Accepted Answer

Daniele°

Perl6 is very good for create lexer/parser

0

09.05.2019

Похожие чаты

Let me put it another way. If you are writing

2 ответов

Похожие вопросы