Похожие чаты

I adopted C++, D, Go, recently trying Elixir, Erlang is

disturbing.

Rust is missing... it's just it entirely missed the point.

Do you even read what C++2a have? They literally killed the barrier to entry with nodules.
U will be able to:

import std.fmt;

int main() {
fmt::printf("hello %s", "hi");
}

With types checked at compile time (and probably compile-time print whi know

2. There's a paper about life-time of objects esp those with common bugs which is the first step in destroying Rust's mantra.

I don't want to get into other features that will likely cancel out any competition in near feature.

C++ is now eating C's market share in the Embedded space gradually.
If there's anything that reduces productivity in C++, it will be the absurd compile-time which Modules will definitely solve most of it, and ability to just say go get package which will definitely become easier with module system in place.

And with Clang and GCC compiler, transition in the Embedded space hasn't Ben easier and with latest standard support...cool

Now Rust moving forward in Rust 2 will likely break a lot of things which will be another step in it's demise.

C++ is moving the way getting simpler and more terse, Rust is still young and will definitely fall into old C++ complexities sooner or later 'cos we are small...why not add this?!

While lvalue, rvalue, prvalue, xvalue might be confusing, fighting the compiler with borrow checker is bad for entry business too.

2 ответов

23 просмотра

Please format the code you posted, by wrapping it in triple backticks. -> `

what point is Rust missing?) so C++2a will turn into Rust?))

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта