@Pwrdaohelp The following questions are more for Power KPI implementation,

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio
wow, I hope this will not be implemented this way....

The point is that in the case of a treasury loss, it would not be possible to isolate the deposited tokens into the DAO's treasury. If you are talking about committed $PWR tokens, the slashing mechanism is most likely to be handled separately for each proposal or DAO

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio Автор вопроса

then there should be a 3rd vote option: abstain

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio
then there should be a 3rd vote option: abstain

Hm🤔 Well, what options do you propose to assign to abstainers?

0

10 месяцев назад

Mr Turtle - blackturtle - BlackTurtleNode

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio
wow, I hope this will not be implemented this way....

but abstain could also mean lazy/dead, and then you dont want them to just sit there do nothing

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio Автор вопроса

you have to actively vote: abstain

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio
you have to actively vote: abstain

It makes sense. I should discuss your idea with my colleagues 😃

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio
you have to actively vote: abstain

Why not increase the quorum to incentive passive participants to vote?

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio Автор вопроса

Casanova
Why not increase the quorum to incentive passive p...

Increasing quorom is not an incentive

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio
Increasing quorom is not an incentive

It's more practical than your idea, as the goal will not be achieved if no one votes🤷‍♂️

0

10 месяцев назад

Casanova
It's more practical than your idea, as the goal wi...

This just make it harder to reach quorom. It does not make extra people want to vote.

0

10 месяцев назад

Netherworld Art
This just make it harder to reach quorom. It does ...

People committed to DAO should be initially interested in voting

0

10 месяцев назад

Casanova
People committed to DAO should be initially intere...

They will not vote if they do not see a profit incentive.

0

10 месяцев назад

Netherworld Art
They will not vote if they do not see a profit inc...

That's true and healthy for DAO interests. But meanwhile, they can vote 'no' or be involved in voting to reach the quorum if the idea cost of DAO efforts

0

10 месяцев назад

Slashing is a risk when voting. People will not vote just for voting sake. They will vote yes" if they see profit incentive, and vote "no" if they think proposal will lose money. If they do not know if either one is a good vote, they will not vote just to reach quorom.

0

10 месяцев назад

Netherworld Art
Slashing is a risk when voting. People will not vo...

Why did you commit your tokens if you skipped voting? Vote for 'no' if the proposal is meaningless

0

10 месяцев назад

Casanova
Why did you commit your tokens if you skipped voti...

Why not? What concern is it of yours if I commit and then not vote? If you want me to vote, make incentive to do so. Making quorom harder to reach will not make me vote if I do not care to vote on a proposal in first place.

0

10 месяцев назад

Netherworld Art
Why not? What concern is it of yours if I commit a...

You can vote no if you think the proposal will fail. Your initiative is to gain more net value for the treasury

0

10 месяцев назад

Casanova
You can vote no if you think the proposal will fai...

You are not listening at all, and I do not care to repeat myself. :))

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio Автор вопроса

Casanova
It's more practical than your idea, as the goal wi...

It is about when a proposal is not good, but is profitable. Currently voting no or not voting would result in no gain, potential loss for such proposals. Example: proposal put all XTN in Vires lending for 0.10% APY, voting NO would result in slashing, but I don't want to vote YES, because I think there are better options. So abstaining is the preferred option.

0

10 месяцев назад

Netherworld Art
They will not vote if they do not see a profit inc...

Hello, Netherworld Art! Your words valid for DAOs aimed at earning. What about charitable DAOs?

0

10 месяцев назад

PWR help ✊⚡️
Hello, Netherworld Art! Your words valid for DAOs ...

I am poor, I can not afford to participate in charity when I can barely afford to buy food for myself. So I have not thought about this at all. :))

0

10 месяцев назад

Netherworld Art
I am poor, I can not afford to participate in char...

That sounds sad. Hopefully your situation will improve in the short term🙏

0

10 месяцев назад

PWR help ✊⚡️
That sounds sad. Hopefully your situation will imp...

I will draw for money 😆

0

10 месяцев назад

Netherworld Art
You are not listening at all, and I do not care to...

Consider my previous words as measures in complex, such as voters oriented only on profitable ideas and a higher quorum to prevent the passing of bad ideas. Also, I'm confused that you want to stay away due to a lack of initiatives after committing to for-profit DAO😐

0

10 месяцев назад

Casanova
Consider my previous words as measures in complex,...

You do not listen at all. If I do not know if a proposal is profitable or will lose money, then voting is a risk of slashing. If I vote yes and it is not profitable, I lose pwr. If I vote no, and it is profitable, I lose pwr. Voting just to make quorom is not something I will do.

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio Автор вопроса

Netherworld Art
I am poor, I can not afford to participate in char...

Food Dao for Netherworld

0

10 месяцев назад

Ivan | 🔥BURN-XTN x 🌀WHIRLPOOL project owner | see bio
Food Dao for Netherworld

Shame there is not much profit in this 😆

0

10 месяцев назад