Only 5 or 6 mins in but so far man it's just word salad nonsense lol
Sorry 16 minutes***
20 minutes in he finally even begins to gloss the question. And it is being done so horribly imho
I think he has a point on that seniority tends to make programmers more narrow-minded in the way they solve problem. I do have to force myself to try new ways to do things and even then, one can definitely reliably recognize my coding style
I think so too. But it's a bit of a weak point *imho* because of the way he explains it. He acts like there's some hidden mechanism or neurological reason for it when in reality this isn't anything more than nuance and discretion, something literally every field of the world has and uses too.
Simply put, we fall into patterns of subsets of languages because the subset is generally more reliable tooling
Well, he is correct in thinking that there is a deeper neurological mechanism to it (I recommend Introduction to Language and other books from linguistics for more details)
I study philology and we deal with the Sam's thing yeah
Обсуждают сегодня