pay a lot of money to get it done.
But to write good C code, you also need to know how to use software tools that ensure your code doesn’t contain serious bugs. This also requires significant expertise and a huge amount of time—time that costs companies a lot of money.
Valgrind, scna-build, are free in license but for Company required many hours for use It.
So why are they pushing languages like Rust?
Because they are easier to use, meaning they require fewer technical skills and significantly less debugging time. It’s a cost saving for companies that far outweighs the elegance and beauty you might achieve with C.
Yes i think that rust has a bright future for new projects. And o If it has no compatibiliy issues with C then that's perfect
The main problem with Rust is that they never bothered to write their own runtime; instead, they’ve always relied on the C runtime.
That's good then it will be easily integrated with C
Not realy, is simplex in x64, but Is not realy portable because rust not implement in correct way the abstraction type
For example in C uintptr_t is a type can contain a value of pointers. In x64 is 64 bit, on Arduino uno Is 16 bit, on Arduino mega Is 32 bit. So, for rust Is 64 bit and many bug fix for differents architecture
Even weaker is the fact that it has no ABI, which prevents it from having any interfacing even with itself in a stable manner without relying on a C ABI that cannot represent its type system accurately. You cannot create a Rust compilation artifact that is not an executable or a very subpar library
Обсуждают сегодня