You're a hypocrite.
The above referenced is not hypocrisy. In reality, that term is often misunderstood and incorrectly applied. The claim fails to take into consideration extremely common variables, such as preference, threat model, purpose, and more. If anything, a security researcher using that software can act as reason for why they'd be keen on criticizing it; improvement is the goal. Furthermore, a premise and conclusion sharing some common denominator is not proof for the conclusion being true. In privacy oriented communities, these are usually in reference to a person's OS choice, such as using Linux regardless of whether it's secure.
You still didn't tell the reason why you use Linux if Windows is better?
No one is calling you a hypocrite. Not every reaction is an attack on you.
Mostly because I have some software that still doesn't run on windows
Why isn't Windows your part?
I've heard Windows is better in every terms, let it be security or anything
It doesn't support extended security labels yet
To their defence, they didn't claim that.
Обсуждают сегодня