1. Invalid: the data was not sent to Amazon it

Question

1. Invalid: the data was not sent to Amazon it

was sent to Ubuntu's own servers where it was obfuscated from Amazon . . . still stupid but this is misleading.

2. Invalid: This is absurd since Debian made this decision not Canonical and Canonical collaborates with Debian, not fights them.

3. Invalid: The community did decide what to do with Unity or is the years of hate towards them not enough of a sign?

4. Valid

5. Invalid: Ubuntu does not require this data to be sent to them. The user has the choice to send it or not. The data is also anonymous and is nothing more than the data that people share all the time with screenshots of neofetch. This is not at all "compromising privacy" in any way.

6. Valid

7. invalid because Ubuntu provides a Vanilla version of GNOME with none of their customizations.

so 5 out of 7 of these are invalid and not a reason to tell people to not use Ubuntu.

Edit: I missed one.

0

05.05.2018

1 ответов

8 просмотров

Michael | DLN · Answer 1

Michael | DLN Автор вопроса

@buredoRUNofthecyborg ^

0

05.05.2018

Похожие чаты

1. Invalid: the data was not sent to Amazon it

1 ответов

Похожие вопросы