the best in this regard of programming package availability. For more uptodate ones, Fedora supports more "officially" (disadvantage for the same in Arch is packages have to be built locally when sourced from AUR). But Fedora has the slowest mirrors in my location (India), and the package manager is considerably slower. Also the base OS uses 400MB-1GB of extra RAM across desktop environments compared to Arch, even with the exact same packages. So Arch is the one which I am using atm. One question, do the packages not available in official repositories in case of opensuse have to be built locally? Or are the prebuilt? Latter is fine(?)
Short answer. Pretty much everything you wrote is entirely wrong
> Ubuntu is the best Hang on, they're not the absolute worst at something?
Also more official packages in Fedora? Maybe if you add RPM Fusion but unless you do that, you don't even get Telegram on it (despite being even available in Debian's repos because, well.. free software). Fedora is quite possibly even more stoneheaded than Debian on the whole licensing stuff
Обсуждают сегодня