A) It's not minimalist. B) It's not optimised, if it was

Question

A) It's not minimalist. B) It's not optimised, if it was

you would notice that it doesn't run on most products, you use older, safer codepaths and safe compilation options on all repo packages on Arch
C) The configs are the exact same as what the package decides to use? It doesn't do anything special with just about every single package ever.

0

08.11.2019

2 ответов

14 просмотров

Пользователь 61654

that c part is not right. just compare with defaults

0

08.11.2019

Пользователь 61654 · Accepted Answer

Пользователь 61654

if you think loadable kernel modules and such dynamic stuffs are bloat and proper optimization is just march native so yes it's not minimal and not optimized. but i see it's well compiled (with just needed mitigations just where is needed) and well tuned so it can have a good performance everywhere and yes it needs manual changes to be the best for your situations. anyways you can't find a better time saver with this quality

0

08.11.2019

Похожие чаты

A) It's not minimalist. B) It's not optimised, if it was

2 ответов

Похожие вопросы