What'S the difference between arch and Ubuntu other than how

One is user centric and expects you to try and solve issues on your own first using its top-tier documentation, and has a nice community for when you get stuck, the other is Ubuntu.

0

7 месяцев назад

Ujjawal Gupta Автор вопроса

Martin Rys
One is user centric and expects you to try and sol...

So, is there any other technical difference also than ease of use?

0

7 месяцев назад

Vim

Ubuntu has historically been a first point of contact for Windows users coming to Linux, but has gradually shifted to enterprise instead (hence the LTS, and ESM as well). For individual users, it's gotten significantly worse. The snap package manager in particular is a gripe of mine. This is why I'd only use Debian instead. Arch meanwhile has a large focus on DIY. It's got fast updates, and no such thing as an LTS (unless you want to consider the whole rolling release model as an indefinite LTS). Very user-centric, and community-driven. Btw I used to use Arch 🙃

0

7 месяцев назад

Martin Rys

Ujjawal Gupta
So, is there any other technical difference also t...

Canonical isn't capable of even packaging a browser, your question has been asked hundreds of times before, am sure you can google around

0

7 месяцев назад

Ujjawal Gupta Автор вопроса

Martin Rys
Canonical isn't capable of even packaging a browse...

Okey

0

7 месяцев назад